Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (4):687 - 706 (2011)
|Abstract||A crucial question for libertarians about free will and moral responsibility concerns how their accounts secure more control than compatibilism. This problem is particularly exasperating for event-causal libertarianism, as it seems that the only difference between these accounts and compatibilism is that the former require indeterminism. But how can indeterminism, a mere negative condition, enhance control? This worry has led many to conclude that the only viable form of libertarianism is agent-causal libertarianism. In this paper I show that this conclusion is premature. I explain how event-causal libertarianism secures more control than compatibilism by offering a novel argument for incompatibilism. Part of the reason my solution has gone unnoticed is that it is often mistakenly assumed that an agent's control is wholly exhausted by the agent's powers and abilities. I argue, however, that control is constituted not just by what we have the ability to do, but also by what we have the opportunity to do. And it is by furnishing agents with new opportunities that event-causal libertarianism secures enhanced control. In order to defend this claim, I provide an analysis of opportunities and construct a novel incompatibilist argument to show that the opportunity to do otherwise is incompatible with determinism|
|Keywords||free will moral responsibility ability opportunity incompatibilism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. Almeida & M. Bernstein (2003). Lucky Libertarianism. Philosophical Studies 22 (2):93-119.
Bernard Berofsky (2006). The Myth of Source. Acta Analytica 21 (4):3 - 18.
Markus E. Schlosser (forthcoming). The Luck Argument Against Event-Causal Libertarianism: It is Here to Stay. Philosophical Studies.
Alfred R. Mele (2005). Libertarianism, Luck, and Control. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):381-407.
Ishtiyaque H. Haji (2007). Modest Libertarianism, Luck, and Control. Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):77-89.
Christopher Evan Franklin (2011). Farewell to the Luck (and Mind) Argument. Philosophical Studies 156 (2):199-230.
Tomis Kapitan (2002). A Master Argument for Incompatibilism? In Robert H. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Katarzyna Paprzycka (2002). Flickers of Freedom and Frankfurt-Style Cases in the Light of the New Incompatibilism of the Stit Theory. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:553-565.
Göran Duus-Otterström (2010). Betting Against Compatibilism. Res Publica 16 (4):383-396.
Derk Pereboom (forthcoming). The Disappearing Agent Objection to Event-Causal Libertarianism. Philosophical Studies.
John Martin Fischer (1999). The Value of Moral Responsibility. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:129-140.
Paul Russell (2002). Responsibility and Control. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32:587-606.
Helen Beebee & Alfred R. Mele (2002). Humean Compatibilism. Mind 111 (442):201-223.
Added to index2011-02-03
Total downloads53 ( #23,091 of 722,765 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,437 of 722,765 )
How can I increase my downloads?