David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Global Politics 3 (2) (2009)
On 17 February 2008, the province of Kosovo formally declared its independence from Serbia. The most important normative theories of secession*choice theories and just cause theories* appear to justify the creation of a second Albanian state on the Balkans. Kosovo’s independence reflects the will of the vast majority of its inhabitants and can be seen as a remedy for grave human rights violations in the era of Slobodan Milos?evic´. Two problems, however, need to be thoroughly discussed. Firstly, the secession of Kosovo may establish a precedent for other separatist conflicts and contribute to the destabilization of south-east Europe and other world regions. Secondly, the new political authorities in Pristina may not be capable to protect the Serb minority against discrimination and repression. It is argued that both problems give no conclusive reasons to reject Kosovo’s claim for independence. However, some aspects of the secession, for instance the maintenance of the provincial borders, are considered to be illegitimate. Keywords: drawing of borders; independence; majority decision; minority protection; primary right theories; remedial right theories; self-determination; sovereignty; territorial integrity (Published: 26 May 2010) Citation: Ethics & Global Politics, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2010, pp. 123-142. DOI: 10.3402/egp.v3i2.1983
|Keywords||remedial right theory majority decision self-determination primary right theory sovereignty drawing of borders territorial integrity independence minority protection|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Matthew J. Webb (2006). Is There a Liberal Right to Secede From a Liberal State? TRAMES 10 (4):371-386.
Janne Haaland Matlary (2004). The Legitimacy of Military Intervention: How Important is a UN Mandate? Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):129-141.
Josep Costa (2003). On Theories of Secession: Minorities, Majorities and the Multinational State. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (2):63-90.
David Copp (1998). International Law and Morality in the Theory of Secession. Journal of Ethics 2 (3):219-245.
Nicolaus Tideman (2004). Secession as a Human Right. Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (1):9-19.
Allen Buchanan (1997). Theories of Secession. Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1):31–61.
Louis Logister (2007). Global Governance and Civil Society. Some Reflections on NGO Legitimacy. Journal of Global Ethics 3 (2):165 – 179.
Adele Santana (2012). Three Elements of Stakeholder Legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):257-265.
Dorothea Baur & Guido Palazzo (2011). The Moral Legitimacy of NGOs as Partners of Corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (4):579-604.
Jon Garthoff (2010). Legitimacy is Not Authority. Law and Philosophy 29 (6):669-694.
Michel Seymour (2007). Secession as a Remedial Right. Inquiry 50 (4):395 – 423.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads5 ( #224,470 of 1,099,003 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #287,293 of 1,099,003 )
How can I increase my downloads?