David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
On occasion, someone will ask you why you’re a philosopher and not a scientist or some other, more obviously respectable, intellectual. Or a high and mighty philosopher will dismiss all of philosophy with the exception of the history of philosophy. Others will restrict philosophy’s importance to applied philosophy or philosophy with obvious interdisciplinary features. Or someone from a different discipline might be respectful of the philosophical profession but in need of an explanation of why research in philosophy that is not applied, is not interdisciplinary, and does not fall under the heading of the history of philosophy is thought to be important. A university dean or other university official or professor might have just that question. In fact, your cousin might have that question.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
William Bechtel & Mitchell Herschbach (2010). Philosophy of the Cognitive Sciences. In Fritz Allhoff (ed.), Philosophies of the Sciences. Wiley-Blackwell. 239--261.
Peter J. Beurton, Raphael Falk & Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.) (2000). The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution: Historical and Epistemological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Robert Frodeman (ed.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press.
Robert Frodeman (2008). Redefining Ecological Ethics: Science, Policy, and Philosophy at Cape Horn. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (4):597-610.
Sami Pihlström (1999). Applied Philosophy. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):121-133.
Mathias M. Siems, The Taxonomy of Interdisciplinary Legal Research: Finding the Way Out of the Desert.
Bart van Klink & Sanne Taekema, A Dynamic Model of Interdisciplinarity: Limits and Possibilities of Interdisciplinary Research Into Law.
Jorge Luis Nicolas Audy & Marília Morosini (eds.) (2007). Innovation and Interdisciplinarity in the University =. Edipucrs.
Michael McDonald (1992). The Canadian Research Strategy for Applied Ethics: A New Opportunity for Research in Business and Professional Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 11 (8):569 - 583.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads112 ( #9,308 of 1,102,721 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #24,543 of 1,102,721 )
How can I increase my downloads?