What makes a 'good' experiment?

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (4):367-374 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/32.4.367

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Change in Plato’s Conception of the Good.Jim Robinson - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:231-241.
Published digital information is a public good: The case for voted compensation.William Fisher - unknown
Experiments and thought experiments in natural science.David Atkinson - 2001 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 232:209-226.
Adam and eve: A thought experiment.Robin Turner - manuscript
Chasing the Light Einsteinʼs Most Famous Thought Experiment.John D. Norton - unknown
The evidential significance of thought experiment in science.W. J. - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (2):233-250.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
69 (#231,631)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Towards a Typology of Experimental Errors: an Epistemological View.Giora Hon - 1989 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 20 (4):469.
Understanding scientific study via process modeling.Robert W. P. Luk - 2010 - Foundations of Science 15 (1):49-78.
Machine Learning, Misinformation, and Citizen Science.Adrian K. Yee - 2023 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (56):1-24.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Can Theories Be Refuted?Graham Priest & Sandra Harding - 1977 - Philosophical Quarterly 27 (106):73.

Add more references