Doxastic Voluntarism: A Sceptical Defence

Abstract Doxastic voluntarism maintains that we have voluntary control over our beliefs. It is generally denied by contemporary philosophers. I argue that doxastic voluntarism is true: normally, and insofar as we are rational, we are able to suspend belief and, provided we have a natural inclination to believe, we are able to rescind that suspension, and thus to choose to believe. I show that the arguments that have been offered against doxastic voluntarism fail; and that, if the denial of doxastic voluntarism is part of a strategy to defeat scepticism, it is inept, because knowledge presupposes doubt.
Keywords Alston  belief  doubt  doxastic voluntarism  knowledge  scepticism  Williams  Hieronymi  Popper
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,631
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Rico Vitz, Doxastic Voluntarism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Andrew Reisner (forthcoming). Leaps of Knowledge. In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief. OUP.
    Pascal Engel (2002). Volitionism and Voluntarism About Belief. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):265-281.
    Matthew Chrisman (2008). Ought to Believe. Journal of Philosophy 105 (7):346-370.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-03-17

    Total downloads

    20 ( #61,410 of 548,972 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    9 ( #7,649 of 548,972 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums