Equal Accessibility to All: Habermas, Pragmatism, and the Place of Religious Beliefs in a Post-Secular Society
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Constellations 19 (2):267-287 (2012)
This paper explores the epistemological impact of the idea of post-secularism on the concept of public reason. It does so by examining a strand of the Rawls-Habermas debate on the role of religious beliefs within public reason. The paper identifies a difficulty in the liberal solution that depends upon the unwillingness to challenge the proviso-like conception of public reason and contends that this difficulty is overcome neither by Habermas’ “institutional” version of proviso nor by Cristina Lafont’s version of “mutual accountability” proviso. Once acknowledged this blind spot in the theory of public reason, the paper proceeds to show that a pragmatist-based conception of public reason can overcome this shortcoming as it grants to religious beliefs a role that does not compromise the liberal ethics of citizenship while at the same time does not frustrate the communitarian and religious call for a less restrictive conception of the public sphere. The conclusion this paper brings home is that a proviso-free public reason is necessary for tackling the theoretical challenge of defending liberalism in a post-secular society.
|Keywords||John Dewey Jurgen Habermas Christina Lafont Normative Practices|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Roberto Frega (2013). Rehabilitating Warranted Assertibility: Moral Inquiry and the Pragmatic Basis of Objectivity. Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (1):1-23.
Roberto Frega (2013). From Normative Spheres to Normative Practices: New Prospects for Normative Theory After Habermas. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (5):680-712.
Similar books and articles
Roberto Frega (2012). A Pragmatist Critique of Liberal Epistemology: Towards a Practice-Based Account of Public Reason. Critical Horizons 12 (3):293 - 316.
James Boettcher (2009). Habermas, Religion and the Ethics of Citizenship. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (1-2):215-238.
Andrea Baumeister (2011). The Use of “Public Reason” by Religious and Secular Citizens: Limitations of Habermas' Conception of the Role of Religion in the Public Realm. Constellations 18 (2):222-243.
Jeffrey Epstein (2014). Habermas, Virtue Epistemology, and Religious Justifications in the Public Sphere. Hypatia 29 (2):422-439.
D. R. Walhof (2013). Habermas, Same-Sex Marriage and the Problem of Religion in Public Life. Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (3):225-242.
Glen Pettigrove (2005). Rights, Reasons, and Religious Conflict. Social Philosophy Today 21:81-93.
Kevin Vallier (2011). Against Public Reason Liberalism's Accessibility Requirement. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):366-389.
Pamela Beth Harris (2012). The Politics of Judicial Public Reason: Secular Interests and Religious Rights. [REVIEW] Philosophia 40 (2):271-283.
Pieter Duvenage (2010). Communicative Reason and Religion: The Case of Habermas. Sophia 49 (3):343-357.
James P. Sterba (1999). Reconciling Public Reason and Religious Values. Social Theory and Practice 25 (1):1-28.
Cristina Lafont (2007). Religion in the Public Sphere: Remarks on Habermas's Conception of Public Deliberation in Postsecular Societies. Constellations 14 (2):239-259.
Jurgen Habermas (2011). Reconciliation Through the Public Reason : Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism. In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge
Added to index2011-12-11
Total downloads19 ( #144,784 of 1,724,875 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #93,208 of 1,724,875 )
How can I increase my downloads?