|Abstract||Commentators on Pope John Paul II's encyclical Fides et Ratio(1) have not failed to notice the incongruity that envelops the Pope's defense of the powers of reason against contemporary forms of skepticism. As Nicholas Wolterstorff has put it: "How surprising and ironic that roughly two centuries after Voltaire and his cohorts mocked the church as the bastion of irrationality, the church, in the person of the pope, should be the one to put in a good word for reason." (2) In fact, given that professional philosophers of all stripes have largely abandoned the classical search for a comprehensive and systematic wisdom that provides firm answers to the deepest and most pressing human questions, Pope John Paul's call for us philosophers to recover our 'sapiential' vocation is not just ironic but downright mortifying|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Anthony J. Godzieba (2000). The Meanings of Fides Et Ratio. Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):43-52.
Joseph Mathew Angadiyil (2008). The Encyclical Fides Et Ratio : Its Cognitive and Metaphysical Thrust. In Manimala, Varghese & J. (eds.), Fides Et Ratio in a Post-Modern Era: Indian Philosophical Studies, Xiii. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Antonio Sabetta (2012). Faith and Reason: Historical Analysis and Perspectives for the Present. Davies Group, Publishers.
John Paul (ed.) (1999/1998). Encyclical Letter, Fides Et Ratio, of the Supreme Pontiff John Paul Ii: To the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Relationship Between Faith and Reason. United States Catholic Conference.
George Panthanmackal (2008). Fides Et Ratio : A Synopsis and Assessment. In Manimala, Varghese & J. (eds.), Fides Et Ratio in a Post-Modern Era: Indian Philosophical Studies, Xiii. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Ivo Coelho (2008). Rorty's Anti-Foundationalism and Fides Et Ratio. In Manimala, Varghese & J. (eds.), Fides Et Ratio in a Post-Modern Era: Indian Philosophical Studies, Xiii. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Stanislaus Swamikannu (2008). The Legitimate Concern of Fides Et Ratio for Metaphysics. In Manimala, Varghese & J. (eds.), Fides Et Ratio in a Post-Modern Era: Indian Philosophical Studies, Xiii. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Bogusław Wójcik (1999). Fides Et Ratio. Perspectives on John Paul II's Encyclical on the Relationships Between Faith and Reason [Sprawozdania]. Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 25.
Lieven Boeve (2000). The Swan or the Dove? Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):3-24.
John E. Thiel (2000). Faith, Reason, and the Specter of the Enlightenment. Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):25-31.
John J. Conley (2002). The Limits of Metaphysical Reason. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:117-123.
Alfred J. Freddoso (2005). Fides et ratio. Studia Neoaristotelica 2 (2):226-238.
Kevin Hart (2002). Fides Et Ratio Et…. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (2):199-220.
Bernard G. Prusak (2006). Faith and Reason in Theory and Practice. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):23-40.
Reinhard Hütter (2002). Paulatim Facta Est Ratio Humana Sui Ipsius Captiva. Freedom, Truth, and the Unattended Problem of the Will in the Encyclical Fides Et Ratio. Neue Zeitschrift Für Systematische Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 44 (3).
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads10 ( #106,239 of 549,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,703 of 549,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?