Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:79-96 (2001)
|Abstract||In this paper, I observe that Hobbesian physicalism on the one side, and Cartesian dualism on the other, have had a widespread cultural influence on the way we regard ourselves and on the way we behave toward one another. I argue that what we now need is a conceptual space within which we might forge a metaphysical alternative, an alternative that will give us some hope of overcoming the deleterious intellectual, moral, and social consequences of both physicalism and dualism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. Pakaluk (2003). Degrees of Separation in the "Phaedo". Phronesis 48 (2):89 - 115.
Michael Pakaluk (2003). Degrees of Separation in the Phaedo. Phronesis 48 (2):89-115.
Eleonore Stump (1995). Non-Cartesian Substance Dualism and Materialism Without Reductionism. Faith and Philosophy 12 (4):505-531.
Christopher Gilbert (2005). Catholic Cartesian Dualism. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):233-249.
Michael McGhee (1996). The Locations of the Soul. Religious Studies 32 (2):205 - 221.
Gordon Barnes (2004). Is Dualism Religiously and Morally Pernicious? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (1):99-106.
D. Zimmerman (1991). Two Cartesian Arguments for the Simplicity of the Soul. American Philosophical Quarterly 28 (July):127-37.
Mary-Lou Galician & Steve Pasternack (1987). Balancing Good News and Bad News: An Ethical Obligation? Journal of Mass Media Ethics 2 (2):82 – 92.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #39,175 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?