Hacking away at the identity of indiscernibles: Possible worlds and Einstein's principle of equivalence
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophy 92 (9):455-466 (1995)
Purpose:Ultraviolet (UV) corneal cross-linking is an accepted method for the treatment of corneal ecstatic disorders. The authors evaluated whether a rapid treatment protocol (higher intensity and shorter irradiation time) could achieve the same increase in corneal stiffness as the currently-used standard protocol.Methods:Stress-strain measurements were performed on porcine corneal strips. The corneas (n=72) were cut into three strips, each randomly receiving a different treatment: rapid (10 mW/c(2), 9 minutes), standard (3 mW/c(2), 30 minutes) or no irradiation (control, 0 mW/c(2)). After irradiation, Young's modulus of each strip was determined. The results of the stress-strain measurements were analyzed statistically.Results:Statistical analysis showed that, after irradiation, the median value of Young's modulus from both active treatment groups (rapid: 3.83 N/m(2); standard: 3.88 N/m(2)) was significantly higher (p<0.05) than that of the control group (2.91 N/m(2)). Treatment increased Young's modulus by a factor of 1.3. However, there was no significant difference (p=0.43) in the median of Young's modulus between the rapid and standard groups.Conclusions:Rapid UV cross-linking treatment can be regarded as equivalent to the standard procedure in terms of increase in corneal stiffness. The new rapid protocol shortens the treatment duration by more than two-thirds, from 30 minutes to 9 minutes. The safety of the higher intensities has to be addressed in further clinical studies
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jonas Rafael Becker Arenhart (2013). Weak Discernibility in Quantum Mechanics: Does It Save PII? Axiomathes 23 (3):461-484.
Steven French (2013). Semi-Realism, Sociability and Structure. Erkenntnis 78 (1):1 - 18.
Similar books and articles
Thomas R. Foster (1982). Symmetrical Universes and the Identity of Indiscernibles. Philosophy Research Archives 8:169-183.
Michel Ghins & Tim Budden (2001). The Principle of Equivalence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (1):33-51.
Peter Ainsworth (2011). Ontic Structural Realism and the Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles. Erkenntnis 75 (1):67-84.
Ian Hacking (1975). The Identity of Indiscernibles. Journal of Philosophy 72 (9):249-256.
Michael Della Rocca (2005). Two Spheres, Twenty Spheres, and the Identity of Indiscernibles. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):480–492.
Charles B. Cross (2011). Brute Facts, the Necessity of Identity, and the Identity of Indiscernibles. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):1-10.
Steven French (1989). Why the Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles is Not Contingently True Either. Synthese 78 (2):141 - 166.
Rafael de Clercq (2012). On Some Putative Graph-Theoretic Counterexamples to the Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles. Synthese 187 (2):661-672.
Robin Jeshion (2006). The Identity of Indiscernibles and the Co-Location Problem. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2):163–176.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #104,774 of 1,793,090 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #138,006 of 1,793,090 )
How can I increase my downloads?