Human Nature, Potency and the Incarnation

Faith and Philosophy 3 (1):27-53 (1986)
According to the Christian doctrine of the Incarnation, the Son of God is truly but only contingently a human being. But is it also the case that Christ’s individual human nature is only contingently united to a divine person? The affirmative answer to this question, explicitly espoused by Duns Scotus and William of Ockham, turns out to be philosophically untenable, while the negative answer, which is arguably implicit in St. Thomas Aquinas, explication of the Incarnation, has some surprising and significant metaphysical consequences
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/faithphil1986312
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Thomas D. Senor (1990). Incarnation and Timelessness. Faith and Philosophy 7 (2):149-164.
Brian Leftow (2011). Composition and Christology. Faith and Philosophy 28 (3):310-322.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

15 ( #175,574 of 1,727,171 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #369,877 of 1,727,171 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.