Metontology , moral particularism, and the “art of existing:” A dialogue between Heidegger, Aristotle, and Bernard Williams [Book Review]
Continental Philosophy Review 43 (4):545-568 (2010)
|Abstract||An important shift occurs in Martin Heidegger’s thinking one year after the publication of Being and Time , in the Appendix to the Metaphysical Foundations of Logic . The shift is from his project of fundamental ontology—which provides an existential analysis of human existence on an ontological level—to metontology . Metontology is a neologism that refers to the ontic sphere of human experience and to the regional ontologies that were excluded from Being and Time. It is within metontology, Heidegger states, that “the question of ethics may be raised for the first time.” This paper makes explicit both Heidegger’s argument for metontology , and the relation between metontology and ethics. In examining what he means by “the art of existing,” the paper argues that there is an ethical dimension to Heidegger’s thinking that corresponds to a moderate form of moral particularism. In order to justify this position, a comparative analysis is made between Heidegger, Aristotle, and Bernard Williams|
|Keywords||Martin Heidegger Aristotle Bernard Williams Moral particularism Metontology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Steven Galt Crowell (2000). Metaphysics, Metontology, and the End of Being and Time. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):307-331.
William McNeill (1992). Metaphysics, Fundamental Ontology, Metontology 1925–1935. Heidegger Studies 8:63-79.
Mariana Ortega (2005). When Conscience Calls, Will Dasein Answer? Heideggerian Authenticity and the Possibility of Ethical Life. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (1):15 – 34.
Lauren Freeman (2009). Recognition Reconsidered: A Re-Reading of Heidegger’s Being and Time §26. Philosophy Today 53 (1):85-89.
Mark Sinclair (2006). Heidegger, Aristotle, and the Work of Art: Poeisis in Being. Palgrave Macmillan.
John Sallis (ed.) (1970). Heidegger and the Path of Thinking. Pittsburgh,Duquesne University Press.
Gavin Rae (2010). Re-Thinking the Human: Heidegger, Fundamental Ontology, and Humanism. [REVIEW] Human Studies 33 (1):23-39.
Freeman Lauren (2009). Recognition Reconsidered: A Re-Reading of Heidegger’s Being and Time §26. Philosophy Today 53 (1):85–99.
Marjolein Oele (2012). Heidegger's Reading of Aristotle's Concept of Pathos. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):389-406.
Christiane Bailey (2011). The Genesis of Existentials in Animal Life: Heidegger's Appropriation of Aristotle's Ontology of Life. Heidegger Circle Proceedings 1 (1):199-212.
Maria Granik & Mary Troxell (2009). The Autonomy of Art in Heidegger and Schopenhauer. Idealistic Studies 39 (1-3):35-52.
Iain Thomson (2004). Heidegger's Perfectionist Philosophy of Educationin Being and Time. Continental Philosophy Review 37 (4):439-467.
Katherine Anne Willyard, Heidegger, Art and Politics: Exploring the Notion of Truth That Can Be Revealed Through a Work of Art in Relation to the Political Sphere.
Frederick A. Olafson (1998). Heidegger and the Ground of Ethics: A Study of Mitsein. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-11-17
Total downloads48 ( #26,525 of 722,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,867 )
How can I increase my downloads?