Metontology , moral particularism, and the “art of existing:” A dialogue between Heidegger, Aristotle, and Bernard Williams [Book Review]

Continental Philosophy Review 43 (4):545-568 (2010)
Abstract
An important shift occurs in Martin Heidegger’s thinking one year after the publication of Being and Time , in the Appendix to the Metaphysical Foundations of Logic . The shift is from his project of fundamental ontology—which provides an existential analysis of human existence on an ontological level—to metontology . Metontology is a neologism that refers to the ontic sphere of human experience and to the regional ontologies that were excluded from Being and Time. It is within metontology, Heidegger states, that “the question of ethics may be raised for the first time.” This paper makes explicit both Heidegger’s argument for metontology , and the relation between metontology and ethics. In examining what he means by “the art of existing,” the paper argues that there is an ethical dimension to Heidegger’s thinking that corresponds to a moderate form of moral particularism. In order to justify this position, a comparative analysis is made between Heidegger, Aristotle, and Bernard Williams
Keywords Martin Heidegger  Aristotle  Bernard Williams  Moral particularism  Metontology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,825
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
David Bakhurst (2000). Ethical Particularism in Context. In Brad Hooker & Margaret Olivia Little (eds.), Moral Particularism. Oxford University Press. 157--77.
Steven Galt Crowell (2000). Metaphysics, Metontology, and the End of Being and Time. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):307-331.

View all 37 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Steven Galt Crowell (2000). Metaphysics, Metontology, and the End of Being and Time. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):307-331.
Marjolein Oele (2012). Heidegger's Reading of Aristotle's Concept of Pathos. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):389-406.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-11-17

Total downloads

55 ( #30,817 of 1,100,092 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #66,996 of 1,100,092 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.