David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 17 (2):177-194 (1998)
Plato claimed that morality exits to control conflict. Business people increasingly are called upon to resolve moral conflicts between various stakeholders who maintain opposing ethical positions or principles. Attempts to resolve these moral conflicts within business discussions may be exacerbated if disputants have different communicative styles. To better understand the communication process involved in attempts to resolve a moral dilemma, we investigate the "discourse ethics" procedure of Jürgen Habermas. Habermas claims that an individual's level of moral reasoning parallels the type of communication which that individual typically uses in attempts to resolve conflict. Our research focuses upon the relationship between the communicative style used by participants attempting to resolve a particular moral dilemma involving workplace safety and the level of moral reasoning possessed by those participants. The results of our study suggest that, contrary to Habermas' views, participants with "higher" levels of moral reasoning do not use "discursive" communicative tactics more frequently than participants that possessed "lower" moral reasoning.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Paul Neiman (2013). A Social Contract for International Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 114 (1):75-90.
Eva E. Tsahuridu (2006). Anomie and Ethics at Work. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2):163-174.
Similar books and articles
Manjit Monga (2007). Managers' Moral Reasoning: Evidence From Large Indian Manufacturing Organisations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 71 (2):179 - 194.
Mark R. Nixon (1994). Ethical Reasoning and Privileged Information: Resolving Moral Conflict. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (7):571 - 577.
Eva Erman (2007). Conflict and Universal Moral Theory: From Reasonableness to Reason-Giving. Political Theory 35 (5):598 - 623.
Barbara L. Adams, Fannie L. Malone & Woodrow James (1995). Confidentiality Decisions: The Reasoning Process of CPAS in Resolving Ethical Dilemmas. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 14 (12):1015 - 1020.
Barteld Kooi & Allard Tamminga (2008). Moral Conflicts Between Groups of Agents. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (1):1-21.
John H. Taylor & Lawrence J. Walker (1997). Moral Climate and the Development of Moral Reasoning: The Effects of Dyadic Discussions Between Young Offenders. Journal of Moral Education 26 (1):21-43.
Jim Vernon (2008). The Moral Necessity of Moral Conflict in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):67-80.
E. Sharon Mason & Peter E. Mudrack (1997). Do Complex Moral Reasoners Experience Greater Ethical Work Conflict? Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1311-1318.
David Christensen, Jeff Barnes & David Rees (2007). Developing Resolve to Have Moral Courage. Journal of Business Ethics Education 4:79-96.
Robbin Derry (1989). An Empirical Study of Moral Reasoning Among Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 8 (11):855 - 862.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #88,927 of 1,100,077 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #190,060 of 1,100,077 )
How can I increase my downloads?