Synthese 136 (1):31-56 (2003)
|Abstract||We outline Ladyman's 'metaphysical' or 'ontic' form of structuralrealism and defend it against various objections. Cao, in particular, has questioned theview of ontology presupposed by this approach and we argue that by reconceptualisingobjects in structural terms it offers the best hope for the realist in thecontext of modern physics.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Simon Saunders (2003). Structural Realism, Again. Synthese 136 (1):127 - 133.
Antigone M. Nounou (forthcoming). Kinds of Objects and Varieties of Properties. In Elaine Landry & Dean Rickles (eds.), Structures, Objects and Causality. Springer.
Bryan W. Roberts (2011). Group Structural Realism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):47-69.
Daniel McArthur (2006). Recent Debates Over Structural Realism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 37 (2):209 - 224.
Matteo Morganti (2004). On the Preferability of Epistemic Structural Realism. Synthese 142 (1):81--107.
Oliver Pooley (2006). Points, Particles and Structural Realism. In Dean Rickles, Steven French & Juha Saatsi (eds.), The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads158 ( #2,252 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #7,667 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?