Referring when push-comes-to-shove
In Sarah Sawyer (ed.), New Waves in Philosophy of Language. Palgrave Macmillan (2009)
|Abstract||The anchoring focus of this paper is a cluster of complaints that have been raised against reference-based approaches to semantics, in particular against the view defended by Scott Soames (2002). I am going to lump the complaints that I have in mind under the heading of the Threat of Collapse (or the Threat, for short). At the heart of the Threat of Collapse is the accusation that various moves referentialists make in dealing with well-known problems end up undercutting the motivations for a reference-based semantics in the first place.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Quentin Smith (1995). Marcus and the New Theory of Reference: A Reply to Scott Soames. Synthese 104 (2):217 - 244.
Richard Coates (2009). A Strictly Millian Approach to the Definition of the Proper Name. Mind and Language 24 (4):433-444.
John C. Bigelow (1978). Believing in Semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (1):101--144.
Markus Guhe (2012). Utility-Based Generation of Referring Expressions. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (2):306-329.
Jeanette K. Gundel & Nancy Ann Hedberg (eds.) (2008). Reference: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Mark Sainsbury (2005). Reference Without Referents. Clarendon Press.
David McLellan (2005). Globalization in the 21st Century. Theoria 44 (106):119-127.
Kevan Edwards (2010). Concept Referentialism and the Role of Empty Concepts. Mind and Language 25 (1):89-118.
Added to index2009-08-04
Total downloads11 ( #107,331 of 722,764 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?