Scarcity and Saving Lives

The Reasoner 5 (6):89-90 (2011)
Abstract I argue that, because of scarcity, the right to life cannot imply an obligation on others to save the life of the right-holder, and that collectivising resources for health care not only ensures that resources are used inefficiently and inappropriately but also removes from people the authority to make decisions for themselves about matters of health, life and death.
Keywords scarcity  right to life  collective decisions  individualism  'ought' implies 'can'  rights  obligations  inefficiency  open competition  authority
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Tibor R. Machan (2009). Self-Ownership and the Lockean Proviso. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):93-98.
    Samuel J. Kerstein & Greg Bognar (2010). Complete Lives in the Balance. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):37 – 45.
    Clifton Perry (1981). We Are What We Eat. Environmental Ethics 3 (4):341-350.
    Bill Wringe (2005). Needs, Rights, and Collective Obligations. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 80 (57):187-.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-05-25

    Total downloads

    32 ( #38,026 of 551,105 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    28 ( #1,730 of 551,105 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums