Libertarian Papers 2 (5):1-21 (2010)
|Abstract||The dominant tradition in Western philosophy sees rationality as dictating. Thus rationality may require that we believe the best explanation and simple conceptual truths and that we infer in accordance with evident rules of inference. I argue that, given what we know about the growth of knowledge, this authoritarian concept of rationality leads to absurdities and should be abandoned. I then outline a libertarian concept of rationality, derived from Popper, which eschews the dictates and which sees a rational agent as one who questions, criticises, conjectures and experiments. I argue that, while the libertarian approach escapes the absurdities of the authoritarian, it requires two significant developments and an important clarification to be made fully consistent with itself.|
|Keywords||Rationality Authoritarian Libertarian Popper Knowledge Inference Rationalism Critical rationalism Irrational Rational Requirements|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Julian Fink (2010). Asymmetry, Scope, and Rational Consistency. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):109-130.
A. Diller (2013). On Critical and Pancritical Rationalism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):127-156.
Thomas Spitzley (2009). Self-Knowledge and Rationality. Erkenntnis 71 (1):73 - 88.
Shlomo Biderman & Ben-Ami Scharfstein (eds.) (1989). Rationality in Question: On Eastern and Western Views of Rationality. E.J. Brill.
Mark van Roojen (2010). Moral Rationalism and Rational Amoralism. Ethics 120 (3):495–525.
Danny Frederick (2013). Popper, Rationality and the Possibility of Social Science. THEORIA 28 (1):61-75.
Stefano Gattei (2009). Karl Popper's Philosophy of Science: Rationality Without Foundations. Routledge.
Joseph Agassi (1973). Rationality and the Tu Quoque Argument. Inquiry 16 (1-4):395 – 406.
Added to index2010-03-04
Total downloads30 ( #41,568 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #4,465 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?