David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Perspectives on Science 13 (2):166-193 (2005)
: The work of Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossman on the emergence of early modern science is an attempt at a historical sociology of science and a historical epistemology of scientific knowledge. One of their theses is elaborated here, namely that early modern mechanics developed in the study of contemporary technology. In particular I discuss the thesis that the replacement of the Aristotelian concept of motion by the modern general and mathematical concept developed in the study of transmission machines. In addition to a discussion of the thesis and its implications, I also present a case study to substantiate the thesis. I show that Benedetti's famous refutation of Aristotle and his introduction of a new concept of motion depended on empirical knowledge of the newly invented treadle mechanism. I argue that although the historiography of science since the 1930s has explored many of the individual issues first raised by the Marxist historians of science, this perspective remains unique in that it establishes direct and informative connections between the grand narrative of the transition from agrarian-feudal society to industrial production in early capitalism and the development of science and technology down to specific cognitive issues such as shared assumptions concerning the natural order
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Harriet Zuckerman (1989). The Other Merton Thesis. Science in Context 3 (1).
Steven Shapin (1988). Understanding the Merton Thesis. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 79:594-605.
A. Rupert Hall (1963). Merton Revisited. History of Science 2:1.
A. Rupert Hall (1975). Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (3):80-82.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Howard J. Ehrlich (1962). Some Observations on the Neglect of the Sociology of Science. Philosophy of Science 29 (4):369-376.
Donald Hockney (1975). The Bifurcation of Scientific Theories and Indeterminacy of Translation. Philosophy of Science 42 (4):411-427.
Mark S. Peacock (2009). Path Dependence in the Production of Scientific Knowledge. Social Epistemology 23 (2):105 – 124.
Edgar Zilsel (2000). The Social Origins of Modern Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Rick Kuhn (2009). Henryk Grossman : A Biographical Sketch. In Boris Hessen, Henryk Grossmann, Gideon Freudenthal & Peter McLaughlin (eds.), The Social and Economic Roots of the Scientific Revolution: Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann. Springer
Gideon Freudenthal & Peter McLaughlin (2009). Boris Hessen : In Lieu of a Biography. In Boris Hessen, Henryk Grossmann, Gideon Freudenthal & Peter McLaughlin (eds.), The Social and Economic Roots of the Scientific Revolution: Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann. Springer
Russell Olwell (1996). "Condemned to Footnotes": Marxist Scholarship in the History of Science. Science and Society 60 (1):7 - 26.
Boris Hessen, Henryk Grossmann, Gideon Freudenthal & Peter McLaughlin (eds.) (2009). The Social and Economic Roots of the Scientific Revolution: Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann. Springer.
Gideon Freudenthal & Peter McLaughlin (2009). Classical Marxist Historiography of Science : The Hessen-Grossmann-Thesis. In Boris Hessen, Henryk Grossmann, Gideon Freudenthal & Peter McLaughlin (eds.), The Social and Economic Roots of the Scientific Revolution: Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann. Springer
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #185,374 of 1,796,228 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,795 of 1,796,228 )
How can I increase my downloads?