Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):219-229 (2002)
|Abstract||A recent issue of Research in Phenomenology contains a section on "The Future of Phenomenology," but none of the articles contained therein deals with a future engagement of phenomenology with science, especially mathematical natural science. In this paper, I discuss this engagement that was once so central to phenomenology and suggest lines along which its revival can fruitfully occur. Toward this end, I trace the contours of the Heisenberg-Heidegger exchange and show how recent readings of the Platonic , such as those of Sallis and Derrida, can extend this Auseinandersetzung into new regions.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jeffrey Yoshimi (2007). Mathematizing Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (3).
Shaun Gallagher (1997). Mutual Enlightenment: Recent Phenomenology in Cognitive Science. Journal of Consciousness Studies 4 (3):195-214.
Ronald Bruzina (2000). The Future Past and Present - and Not yet Perfect - of Phenomenology. Research in Phenomenology 30 (1):40-53.
Govinda Chandra Dev & Saiyed Abdul Hai (eds.) (1969). Phenomenology. [Dacca, Pakistan Philosophical Congress].
James R. Mensch (1999). Husserl's Concept of the Future. Husserl Studies 16 (1):41-64.
Bernard Freydberg (2012). The Thought of John Sallis: Phenomenology, Plato, Imagination. Northwestern University Press.
Neal De Roo (2011). Derrida and the Future(s) of Phenomenology. Derrida Today 4 (1):107-131.
Alva Noë (2007). The Critique of Pure Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #61,563 of 549,128 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )
How can I increase my downloads?