David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PREFACE. We present a variety of basic theories involving fundamental concepts of naive thinking, of the sort that were common in "natural philosophy" before the dawn of physical science. The most extreme forms of infinity ever formulated are embodied in the branch of mathematics known as abstract set theory, which forms the accepted foundation for all of mathematics. Each of these theories embodies the most extreme forms of infinity ever formulated, in the following sense. ZFC, and even extensions of ZFC with the so called large cardinal axioms, are mutually interpretable with these theories. This is an extended abstract. Proofs of the claims will appear elsewhere.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Shaughan Lavine (1995). Finite Mathematics. Synthese 103 (3):389 - 420.
Ernest J. Welti (1987). The Philosophy of Strict Finitism. Theoria 2 (2):575-582.
Harvey M. Friedman (2011). Part III. Technical Perspectives on Infinity From Advanced Mathematics : 4. The Realm of the Infinite / W. Hugh Woodin ; 5. A Potential Subtlety Concerning the Distinction Between Determinism and Nondeterminism / W. Hugh Woodin ; 6. Concept Calculus : Much Better Than. [REVIEW] In Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.), Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge University Press
Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.) (2011). Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads402 ( #3,355 of 1,796,251 )
Recent downloads (6 months)164 ( #1,106 of 1,796,251 )
How can I increase my downloads?