David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Theology 24 (1):113-135 (2012)
This article provides a detailed examination of Bernard Lonergan’s nuanced understanding of experience and proposes his philosophical stance of critical realism as a foundation for interreligious dialogue. The article begins by acknowledging the existent tension between philosophers and theologians and suggests the problematic of interreligious dialogue as one field of possible collaboration. Critical realism is discussed in comparison to other, and indeed contrasting, positions, and is ultimately defended as the stance that provides correct answers to the so-called ‘three basic questions’ of cognitional theory, epistemology, and metaphysics. The notions of patterns of experience and bias are particularly emphasized in order to highlight the complexity of experience. By way of conclusion, suggestions are made as to how philosophers and theologians might enhance their collaboration by furthering their understanding of religious experience and employing it as a category in interreligious dialogue
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Joseph G. Trabbic (2003). Maimonides, Aquinas, and Interreligious Dialogue. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:221-234.
Douglas Pratt (2007). Pluralism, Postmodernism and Interreligious Dialogue. Sophia 46 (3):245-261.
Willy Pfändtner (2010). Constructive Dialogical Pluralism: A Context of Interreligious Relations. Sophia 49 (1):65-94.
Sumner B. Twiss & Bruce Grelle (eds.) (2000). Explorations in Global Ethics: Comparative Religious Ethics and Interreligious Dialogue. Westview Press.
Ariane Hentsch Cisneros (2011). Understanding Through Appropriation in Interreligious Dialogue on Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (2):246-259.
Amir Dastmalchian (2012). Swinburne on the Atonement: Reflections on Philosophical Theology and Religious Dialogue. Journal of Inter-Religious Dialogue (10):49-60.
Marianne Moyaert (2008). In Response to the Religious Other : Levinas, Interreligious Dialogue and the Otherness of the Other. In Roger Burggraeve (ed.), The Awakening to the Other: A Provocative Dialogue with Emmanuel Levinas. Peeters.
Brad Shipway (2007). Critical Realism and Theological Critical Realism: Opportunities for Dialogue. Journal of Critical Realism 3 (2).
Leonard J. Swidler (ed.) (1999). For All Life: Toward a Universal Declaration of a Global Ethic: An Interreligious Dialogue. White Cloud Press.
James F. Moore (2005). Interreligious Dialogue as an Evolutionary Process. Zygon 40 (2):381-390.
Marianne Moyaert (2010). Interreligious Dialogue and the Value of Openness; Taking the Vulnerability of Religious Attachments Into Account. Heythrop Journal 51 (5):730-740.
Mara Brecht (2010). Meeting the Challenge of Conflicting Religious Belief: A Naturalized Epistemological Approach to Interreligious Dialogue. Heythrop Journal 51 (5):741-752.
Geoffrey M. Hodgson (2004). Some Claims Made for Critical Realism in Economics: Two Case Studies. Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (1):53-73.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads6 ( #230,243 of 1,410,127 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,743 of 1,410,127 )
How can I increase my downloads?