Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):671-672 (2000)
|Abstract||A prospective integration of evolutionary and other approaches to understanding rationality, as well as incorporation of individual difference concerns into the research agenda, are major contributions of Stanovich & West's analysis. This commentary focuses on issues of concern in detailing a dual-system or dual-process model of the sort they propose and using it as a basis for improving judgment.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kenneth S. Pope (1991). Dual Roles and Sexual Intimacies in Psychotherapy: Dual Relationships in Psychotherapy. Ethics and Behavior 1 (1):21 – 34.
Katalin Bimbó (2000). Investigation Into Combinatory Systems with Dual Combinators. Studia Logica 66 (2):285-296.
J. Evans & K. Frankish (eds.) (2008). In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
Keith Frankish (2012). Dual Systems and Dual Attitudes. Mind and Society 11 (1):41-51.
Marek Czarkowski (2010). The Dilemma of Dual Use Biological Research: Polish Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1).
Michael J. Selgelid (2009). Dual-Use Research Codes of Conduct: Lessons From the Life Sciences. Nanoethics 3 (3):175-183.
Keith Frankish (2010). Dual-Process and Dual-System Theories of Reasoning. Philosophy Compass 5 (10):914-926.
Katalin Bimbó (2003). The Church-Rosser Property in Dual Combinatory Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (1):132-152.
Linden J. Ball & Jeremy D. Quayle (2000). Alternative Task Construals, Computational Escape Hatches, and Dual-System Theories of Reasoning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):667-668.
Linda A. W. Brakel & Howard Shevrin (2003). Freud's Dual Process Theory and the Place of the a-Rational. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):527-528.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #201,838 of 549,069 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,069 )
How can I increase my downloads?