GRW theory
| Abstract | Ψ and out corresponding to the marble being inside or outside the box. These states are eigenvectors of the operator Bˆ , measuring whether the marble is inside or outside the box. The formalism of quantum mechanics.. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
GC Ghirardi & A. Bassi (1999). Do Dynamical Reduction Models Imply That Arithmetic Does Not Apply to Ordinary Macroscopic Objects? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):49-64.
Mauro Dorato & Michael Esfeld (2010). GRW as an Ontology of Dispositions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (1):41-49.
Peter J. Lewis (1997). Quantum Mechanics, Orthogonality, and Counting. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):313-328.
Alberto Cordero (1999). Are GRW Tails as Bad as They Say? Philosophy of Science 66 (3):71.
Roman Frigg & Carl Hoefer (2007). Probability in GRW Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (2):371-389.
Peter Lewis (1995). GRW and the Tails Problem. Topoi 14 (1):23-33.
Rob Clifton & Bradley Monton (1999). Losing Your Marbles in Wavefunction Collapse Theories. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (4):697 - 717.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads10 ( #106,301 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |

