"If you don't like it, leave it": The problem of exit in social contractarian arguments
Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (1):40–70 (2003)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesOskari Kuusela (2008). Transcendental Arguments and the Problem of Dogmatism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):57 – 75.
Michael Keeley & Jill W. Graham (1991). Exit, Voice, and Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (5):349 - 355.
Sheldon Wein (1986). Plato and the Social Contract. Philosophy Research Archives 12:67-77.
David Ellerman (2010). Inalienable Rights: A Litmus Test for Liberal Theories of Justice. Law and Philosophy 29 (Sept.):571-599.
Peter Vallentyne (1989). Contractarianism and the Assumption of Mutual Unconcern. Philosophical Studies 56 (2):187 - 192.
Dominik Zaum (2009). The Norms and Politics of Exit: Ending Postconflict Transitional Administrations. Ethics and International Affairs 23 (2):189-208.
Michael Jacovides (2010). Do Experiences Represent? Inquiry 53 (1):87-103.
Ben Wempe (2008). Four Design Criteria for Any Future Contractarian Theory of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3):697 - 714.
Thomas Donaldson (1995). Contractarian Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (2):173-186.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads16 ( #74,590 of 548,999 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 548,999 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
