Graduate studies at Western
Pittsburgh, Duquesne University Press (1965)
|Abstract||The central theme is a hitherto unknown explanation of the “temporality” of the person as proposed by the late Max Scheler. The first part deals with the meaning of “absolute time” in general. The second part shows how the temporality of the person is to be seen as “absolute” time on the basis of two opposing principles in man: the “life-center” or impulsion, and “mind” which, without the former, remains powerless, but conjoined with it “become” personal in absolute time|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John White (2001). Max Scheler's Tripartite Anthropology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:255-266.
John R. White (2005). Exemplary Persons and Ethics. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (1):57-90.
Tapio Puolimatka (2008). Max Scheler and the Idea of a Well Rounded Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (3):362–382.
Hanna Hafkesbrink (1942). The Meaning of Objectivism and Realism in Max Scheler's Philosophy of Religion: A Contribution to the Understanding of Max Scheler's Catholic Period. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2 (3):292-309.
John J. Drummond (2005). Personalism and the Metaphysical. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (1):203-212.
Leon J. Goldstein (1963). Book Review:Man's Place in Nature Max Scheler, Hans Meyerhoff; Ressentiment Max Scheler, Lewis Coser, William W. Holdheim. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 30 (3):292-.
Dietrich von Hildebrand (2005). The Personality of Max Scheler. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (1):45-55.
Manfred Frings (1986). Max Scheler. Philosophy and Theology 1 (1):49-63.
Manfred S. Frings (1992). Max Scheler. Philosophy and Theology 6 (3):49-63.
Added to index2009-09-15
Total downloads5 ( #170,270 of 739,367 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,367 )
How can I increase my downloads?