Graduate studies at Western
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (2):159–177 (1998)
|Abstract||This paper explores the relation between rational authority and social power, proceeding by way of a philosophical genealogy derived from Edward Craig's Knowledge and the State of Nature. The position advocated avoids the errors both of the 'traditionalist' (who regards the socio-political as irrelevant to epistemology) and of the 'reductivist' (who regards reason as just another form of social power). The argument is that a norm of credibility governs epistemic practice in the state of nature, which, when socially manifested, is likely to imitate the structures of social power. A phenomenon of epistemic injustice is explained, and the politicizing implication for epistemology educed|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ciaran Cronin (1996). Bourdieu and Foucault on Power and Modernity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (6):55-85.
Evelyn Brister (2009). Feminist Epistemology, Contextualism, and Philosophical Skepticism. Metaphilosophy 40 (5):671-688.
Kai A. Schafft & David L. Brown (2003). Social Capital, Social Networks, and Social Power. Social Epistemology 17 (4):329 – 342.
Miranda Fricker (2006). Powerlessness and Social Interpretation. Episteme 3 (1-2):96-108.
José Medina (2011). The Relevance of Credibility Excess in a Proportional View of Epistemic Injustice: Differential Epistemic Authority and the Social Imaginary. Social Epistemology 25 (1):15-35.
M. Baurmann (2000). Legal Authority as a Social Fact. Law and Philosophy 19 (2):247-262.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads98 ( #8,156 of 731,079 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #14,866 of 731,079 )
How can I increase my downloads?