Graduate studies at Western
British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2):184-198 (2007)
|Abstract||Two assumptions are common in discussions of the paradox of tragedy: (1) that tragic pleasure requires that the work be fictional or, if non-fiction, then non-transparently represented; and (2) that tragic pleasure may be provoked by a wide variety of art forms. In opposition to (1) I argue that certain documentaries could produce tragic pleasure. This is not to say that any sad or painful documentary could do so. In considering which documentaries might be plausible candidates, I further argue, against (2), that the scope of tragic pleasure is limited to works that possess certain thematic and narrative features.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Elisa Galgut (2001). The Poetry and the Pity: Hume's Account of Tragic Pleasure. British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (4):411-424.
William Price Albrecht (1975). The Sublime Pleasures of Tragedy: A Study of Critical Theory From Dennis to Keats. University Press of Kansas.
Aaron Smuts (2011). The Feels Good Theory of Pleasure. Philosophical Studies 155 (2):241-265.
N. Georgopoulos (ed.) (1993). Tragedy and Philosophy. St. Martin's Press.
Aaron Smuts (2007). The Paradox of Painful Art. Journal of Aesthetic Education 41 (3):59-77.
Stuart Rachels (2004). Six Theses About Pleasure. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):247-267.
Joseph Westfall (2003). Nietzsche and the Approach of Tragedy. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3):333-350.
Julia Peters (2011). A Theory of Tragic Experience According to Hegel. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):85-106.
Martin Donougho (2006). Hegel's Pragmatics of Tragedy. Idealistic Studies 36 (3):153-168.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #33,849 of 740,329 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,235 of 740,329 )
How can I increase my downloads?