David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (3):385-414 (2014)
This paper is concerned with a propositional modal logic with operators for necessity, actuality and apriority. The logic is characterized by a class of relational structures defined according to ideas of epistemic two-dimensional semantics, and can therefore be seen as formalizing the relations between necessity, actuality and apriority according to epistemic two-dimensional semantics. We can ask whether this logic is correct, in the sense that its theorems are all and only the informally valid formulas. This paper gives outlines of two arguments that jointly show that this is the case. The first is intended to show that the logic is informally sound, in the sense that all of its theorems are informally valid. The second is intended to show that it is informally complete, in the sense that all informal validities are among its theorems. In order to give these arguments, a number of independently interesting results concerning the logic are proven. In particular, the soundness and completeness of two proof systems with respect to the semantics is proven (Theorems 2.11 and 2.15), as well as a normal form theorem (Theorem 3.2), an elimination theorem for the actuality operator (Corollary 3.6), and the decidability of the logic (Corollary 3.7). It turns out that the logic invalidates a plausible principle concerning the interaction of apriority and necessity; consequently, a variant semantics is briefly explored on which this principle is valid. The paper concludes by assessing the implications of these results for epistemic two-dimensional semantics.
|Keywords||Modal logic Necessity Apriority Actuality Two-Dimensional Semantics Nesting Problem|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter Fritz (2013). A Logic for Epistemic Two-Dimensional Semantics. Synthese 190 (10):1753-1770.
Martin Davies (2004). Reference, Contingency, and the Two-Dimensional Framework. Philosophical Studies 118 (1-2):83-131.
Lennart Åqvist (1999). The Logic of Historical Necessity as Founded on Two-Dimensional Modal Tense Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (4):329-369.
Karen Ng (2009). Hegel's Logic of Actuality. Review of Metaphysics 63 (1):139-172.
Yannis Stephanou (2001). Indexed Actuality. Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (4):355-393.
Andrew Bacon (forthcoming). Representing Counterparts. Australasian Journal of Logic.
Ulrich Meyer (2013). Counterpart Theory and the Actuality Operator. Mind 122 (485):27-42.
Pieranna Garavaso (1992). Actuality and Necessity. Journal of Critical Analysis 9 (2):35-40.
Benedikt Paul Göcke, Martin Pleitz & Hanno von Wulfen (2008). How to Kripke Brandom's Notion of Necessity. In Bernd Prien & David P. Schweikard (eds.), Robert Brandom. Analytic Pragmatist. ontos.
Ulrich Meyer (2009). 'Now' and 'Then' in Tense Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (2):229-247.
Steve Awodey & Kohei Kishida, Topology and Modality: The Topological Interpretation of First-Order Modal Logic.
Soshichi Uchii (1972). Inductive Logic with Causal Modalities: A Probabilistic Approach. Philosophy of Science 39 (2):162-178.
Ernst Zimmermann (2003). Elementary Definability and Completeness in General and Positive Modal Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (1):99-117.
Added to index2012-09-09
Total downloads166 ( #3,966 of 1,098,844 )
Recent downloads (6 months)57 ( #1,044 of 1,098,844 )
How can I increase my downloads?