A pilot qualitative study of “conflicts of interests and/or conflicting interests” among canadian bioethicists. Part 1: Five cases, experiences and lessons learned [Book Review]

HEC Forum 22 (1):5-17 (2010)
Abstract
In this pilot qualitative study 13 clinical bioethicists from across Canada were interviewed about their experiences of conflicts of interest and/or conflicting interests in their professional roles. The interviews generated five composite cases. Participants reported being significantly impacted by these experiences both personally and professionally
Keywords Bioethics  Clinical ethics consultation  Clinical ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10730-010-9124-7
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 17,879
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Jason Scott Robert (2009). Toward a Better Bioethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):283-291.
Alex Voorhoeve (2004). John Rawls. In Julian Baggini & Jeremy Stangroom (eds.), The Great Thinkers A-Z. Continuum

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-05-07

Total downloads

11 ( #253,272 of 1,781,481 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #295,005 of 1,781,481 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.