David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (3):257-268 (2008)
Kant and Confucius maintain that the art of becoming human is synonymous with the unending process of becoming moral. According to Kant, I must imagine a world in which the universality of my maxims were possible, while realizing that if such a world existed, then morality would disappear. Morality is an impossible possibility because it always meets resistance in our encounter with nature. According to Confucius, human beings become moral by integrating themselves into the already meaningful natural order that is tian 天. Like Kant, he upholds the dignity of human beings. For Kant this dignity rests on the autonomy of each human being’s reason, while for Confucius it is dependent upon our interconnection with each other, demanding ongoing self-extension. Despite these differences, the two thinkers would concur that our efforts at humanization are unceasing and that we may never fully live up to our human potential.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Charles Taylor (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard University Press.
Immanuel Kant (2007). Lectures on Pedagogy (1803). In Anthropology, History, and Education. Cambridge University Press
Catherine Chalier (2002). What Ought I to Do?: Morality in Kant and Levinas. Cornell University Press.
Chad Hansen (1972). Freedom and Moral Responsibility in Confucian Ethics. Philosophy East and West 22 (2):169-186.
Julia Ching (1978). Chinese Ethics and Kant. Philosophy East and West 28 (2):161-172.
Citations of this work BETA
Peter R. Woods & David A. Lamond (2011). What Would Confucius Do? – Confucian Ethics and Self-Regulation in Management. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (4):669-683.
Ling Feng & Derek Newton (2012). Some Implications for Moral Education of the Confucian Principle of Harmony: Learning From Sustainability Education Practice in China. Journal of Moral Education 41 (3):341-351.
Similar books and articles
Paul Guyer (2000). Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge University Press.
Holly L. Wilson (2000). Kant's Views of Human Animality. In The Proceedings of the IX International Kant Kongress in Berlin Germany.
Katrin Froese (2008). Organic Virtue: Reading Mencius with Rousseau. Asian Philosophy 18 (1):83 – 104.
Ernesto V. Garcia (2000). The Social Nature of Kantian Dignity. Social Philosophy Today 16:127-139.
Confucius (2008). The Sayings of Confucius. Bibliolife.
Sibylle Rolf (2012). Humanity as an Object of Respect: Immanuel Kant's Anthropological Approach and the Foundation for Morality. Heythrop Journal 53 (4):594-605.
Patrick Kain (2010). Duties Regarding Animals. In Lara Denis (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press 210--233.
Salim Kemal (1986). Kant and Fine Art: An Essay on Kant and the Philosophy of Fine Art and Culture. Oxford University Press.
Camille Atkinson (2007). Kant on Human Nature and Radical Evil. Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):215-224.
Oliver Sensen (2009). Kant's Conception of Human Dignity. Kant-Studien 100 (3):309-331.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads55 ( #66,276 of 1,780,583 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,765 of 1,780,583 )
How can I increase my downloads?