David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Educational Studies 55 (3):264 - 285 (2007)
This paper considers a distinction between two types of politics developed by Michael Oakeshott in his book The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Scepticism (1996) and argues that the theoretical framework proposed supplies an illuminating and productive perspective for examining the notion of political extremism. These positions are linked to two other important aspects of his work, namely his account of 'enterprise' and 'civil' association and his differentiation between abstract philosophical entities and concrete political situations. There is also a discussion of the idea of 'perfectionism' which is central to the politics offaith. The paper concludes with a consideration of some of the implications for political education arising from this analysis.
|Keywords||perfectionism scepticism faith extremism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Nozick (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. Basic Books.
J. Rawls (1995). Political Liberalism. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Michael Oakeshott (1991). On Human Conduct. Clarendon Press.
Raymond Geuss (2001). History and Illusion in Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Dorothy Emmett & Michael Oakeshott (1963). Rationalism in Politics, and Other Essays. Philosophical Quarterly 13 (52):283.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Oakeshott (1996). The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Scepticism. Yale University Press.
Ann Hartle (1997). Oakeshott, Michael. The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Scepticism. Review of Metaphysics 50 (3):676-678.
Corey Abel (2005). Appropriating Aristotle. In Corey Abel Timothy Fuller (ed.), The Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott.
Bhikhu Parekh (1995). Oakeshott's Theory of Civil Association:Religion, Politics, and the Moral Life. Michael Oakeshott, Timothy Fuller; Morality and Politics in Modern Europe: The Harvard Lectures. Shirley Robin Letwin. Ethics 106 (1):158-.
Steven Anthony Gerencser (2000). The Skeptic's Oakeshott. St. Martin's Press.
Min Reuchamps, Bipolarity in Alexis de Tocqueville's, Karl Marx's, Friedrich Nietzsche's, and Michael Oakeshott's Political Theories.
Efraim Podoksik (ed.) (2012). The Cambridge Companion to Oakeshott. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Oakeshott (1993). Religion, Politics, and the Moral Life. Yale University Press.
David Boucher (2001). The Politics Of Faith and the Politics Of Scepticism. International Studies in Philosophy 33 (2):151-152.
Struan Jacobs & Ian Tregenza (2013). Rationalism and Tradition: The Popper–Oakeshott Conversation. European Journal of Political Theory 13 (1):1474885112471274.
C. A. J. Coady (2008). Messy Morality: The Challenge of Politics. Oxford University Press.
Efraim Podoksik (2009). Commentary on Elizabeth Corey's Interpretation of Michael Oakeshott. Zygon 44 (1):223-226.
Roland Bleiker (2009). Aesthetics and World Politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads17 ( #157,027 of 1,725,418 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #211,008 of 1,725,418 )
How can I increase my downloads?