The Latin Aorist Subjunctive

The Classical Review 4 (08):342-346 (1890)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified (fix it)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation 		Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,679
External links
    • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    E. A. Sonnenschein (1890). The Latin Aorist Subjunctive. The Classical Review 4 (09):398-399.
    E. C. Woodcock (1948). The Latin Subjunctive S. A. Handford: The Latin Subjunctive, its Usage and Development From Plautus to Tacitus. Pp. 184. London: Methuen, 1947. Cloth, 10s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 62 (02):73-79.
    H. C. Elmer (1898). The Aorist Injunctive in Latin. The Classical Review 12 (02):100-104.
    J. P. Postgate (1902). Some Recent American Work in Latin Grammar The Subjunctive Substantive Clauses in Plautus Not Including Indirect Questions. By Charles L. Durham. Cornell Studies in Classical Philology, No. Xiii. The Macmillan Company, 1901. Pp. Vi. 120. Price 80 Cents. The Stimulative Subjunctive in Latin. By Prof Charles E. Bennett, Cornell University. Transactions of the American Philological Association (Ginn & Co.) for 1900, Pp. 223–250. A Study in Case Rivalry Being an Investigation Regarding the Use of the Genitive and the Accusative in Latin with Verbs of Remembering and Forgetting. By Clinton L. Babcock. Cornell Studies, Xiv. The Macmillan Co. 1901. Pp. Vi. 120. Price 60 Cents. The Case Constructions After the Comparative in Latin. By K. P. R. Neville. Cornell Studies, Xv. The Macmillan Co. 1901. Pp. 87. Price 80 Cents. The Latin Pronouns is, Hio, Iste, Ipse. By Clarence Linton Meadee, Ph.D. Instructor in Latin in the University of Michigan. The Macmillan Co. New York; Macmillans. London. 1901. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 16 (04):226-231.
    Patrick Sheil (2009). Kierkegaard and Levinas: The Subjunctive Mood. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
    H. C. Elmer (1898). A Negleoted Use of the Latin Subjunctive. The Classical Review 12 (04):199-205.
    H. C. Elmer (1900). Should the May-Potential Use of the Subjunctive Be Recognized in Latin ? The Classical Review 14 (04):219-222.
    Willard K. Clement (1900). Two Notes on the Latin Subjunctive. The Classical Review 14 (04):222-.
    Wm Gardner Hale (1894). The 'Prospective Subjunctive' in Greek and Latin. The Classical Review 8 (04):166-169.
    Sarah Moss (forthcoming). Subjunctive Credences and Semantic Humility1. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
    W. J. Goodrich (1917). On the Prospective Use of the Latin Imperfect Subjunctive in Relative Clauses. The Classical Review 31 (3-4):83-86.
    Eric Swanson (2013). Subjunctive Biscuit and Stand-Off Conditionals. Philosophical Studies 163 (3):637-648.
    R. S. Conway (1910). The Unity of the Latin Subjunctive: A Quest I. Conway on Sonnenschein. The Classical Review 24 (07):215-216.
    Kai von Fintel, The Presupposition of Subjunctive Conditionals.
    R. A. Fumerton (1976). Subjunctive Conditionals. Philosophy of Science 43 (4):523-538.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

    Added to index

    2011-12-06

    Total downloads

    0

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    0

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    		There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums




    Applied ethicsEpistemologyHistory of Western PhilosophyMeta-ethicsMetaphysicsNormative ethics
    Philosophy of biologyPhilosophy of languagePhilosophy of mindPhilosophy of religionScience Logic and MathematicsMore ...
    Home | New books and articles | Bibliographies | Philosophy journals | Discussions | The Categorization Project | About PhilPapers | API | Contact us

    Hosted by The Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Study, University of London
    This site uses Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

    Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
    All rights reserved by David Bourget and David Chalmers

    Page generated Wed May 22 16:36:05 2013 - Hash code: nOVvvz+/SI3UwULuf8zC0A