Sociological Theory 19 (1):24-40 (2001)
|Abstract||The reason why agency/structure and micro/macro debates remain unresolved is the bad essentialist habit of treating such pairs as opposite natural kinds. Once variation is allowed, agency and structure, or micro and macro, are temporary poles bracketing a continuum, with social entities moving along this continuum over time. Explaining these transformations from agency into structure, or micro into macro, and vice versa is the challenge for explanatory theory. This challenge is met by switching to a constructivist level of second-order observing. Then, agency and structure become variable devices or frames different observers might use to perform different sorts of cultural work|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sharon Hays (1994). Structure and Agency and the Sticky Problem of Culture. Sociological Theory 12 (1):57-72.
Alexander Rueger (2004). Reduction, Autonomy, and Causal Exclusion Among Physical Properties. Synthese 139 (1):1-21.
Gil Friedman (1997). Agency, Structure, and International Politics: From Ontology to Empirical Inquiry. Routledge.
Karsten R. Stueber (2006). How to Structure a Social Theory?: A Critical Response to Anthony King’s the Structure of Social Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (1):95-104.
Alexander Rueger (2004). Reduction, Autonomy, and Causal Exclusion Among Physical Properties. Synthese 139 (1):1 - 21.
L. E. E. M. (1990). The Micro-Macro Problem in Collective Behavior: Reconciling Agency and Structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (3):213–233.
Marcelo Sabatés (2001). Micro-Level Indeterminism and Macro-Level Determinism. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:11-18.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads61 ( #15,566 of 549,697 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,697 )
How can I increase my downloads?