|Abstract||The separation of the legislative, executive and judiciary powers is a key principle in most democratic constitutions. We analyze the costs and benefits of separating legislature and executive in an incomplete contracts model: The executive can decide to implement public projects. Under separation of powers, the legislature sets up a decision-making framework that leaves the executive with the residual decision-making rights. Separation of powers is the more beneficial, the larger the danger of extreme policy preferences of the residual political decision-maker.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Iain M. Stewart, Men of Class: Aristotle, Montesquieu and Dicey on 'Separation of Powers' and 'the Rule of Law'.
Jacques Ziller, Separation of Powers in the European Union's Intertwined System of Government - a Treaty Based Analysis for the Use of Political Scientists and Constitutional Lawyers.
Alfonso R. Oddo (2001). Healthcare Ethics: A Patient-Centered Decision Model. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):125 - 134.
Ronald J. Pestritto (2007). The Progressive Origins of the Administrative State: Wilson, Goodnow, and Landis. Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):16-54.
Patrick Primeaux & John Stieber (1997). Managing Business Ethics and Opportunity Costs. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (8):835-842.
Cornelius P. Ford (1933). The Separation of Governmental Powers. Thought 7 (4):588-601.
Hilary Bok, Baron de Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Luca Anderlini & Leonardo Felli (1999). Incomplete Contracts and Complexity Costs. Theory and Decision 46 (1):23-50.
Added to index2009-05-17
Total downloads8 ( #131,614 of 722,681 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,273 of 722,681 )
How can I increase my downloads?