Relative truth definability of axiomatic truth theories

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):305-344 (2010)
The present paper suggests relative truth definability as a tool for comparing conceptual aspects of axiomatic theories of truth and gives an overview of recent developments of axiomatic theories of truth in the light of it. We also show several new proof-theoretic results via relative truth definability including a complete answer to the conjecture raised by Feferman in [13]
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2178/bsl/1286284556
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Martin Fischer (2014). Truth and Speed-Up. Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (2):319-340.
Kentaro Fujimoto (2012). Classes and Truths in Set Theory. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (11):1484-1523.
Thomas Schindler (2014). Axioms for Grounded Truth. Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):73-83.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

184 ( #10,406 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #147,227 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.