Continental Philosophy Review 34 (4):419-436 (2001)
|Abstract||This paper examines the role of Habermas's concept of the lifeworld in processes of reaching mutual understanding. This concept is shown to be ultimately too amorphous to bear the theoretical weight Habermas places on it. He conceives the lifeworld both as diffuse and holistic, yet also as structured; as a set of taken-for-granted and counterfactual presuppositions, yet also as a kind of knowledge. In the end, he presupposes what the lifeworld is supposed to explain: mutual intelligibility of subjects in interaction. These conceptual tensions affect the explanatory power of the lifeworld and the usefulness of the theory of communicative action for conflict resolution. Where conflict resolution is aimed at mediating radical disagreements with minimal concord between parties, presuming consensus may not be possible or optimal. The present analysis argues for the need to develop other means of establishing a sufficient level of background consensus against which communicative action can take place.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
L. E. E. George (forthcoming). Systemic Colonization of the Educational Lifeworld: An Example in Literacy Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory.
Ann Ashworth & Peter Ashworth (2003). The Lifeworld as Phenomenon and as Research Heuristic, Exemplified by a Study of the Lifeworld of a Person Suffering Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 34 (2):179-205.
Andrew Edgar (2009). The Hermeneutic Challenge of Genetic Engineering: Habermas and the Transhumanists. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (2):157-167.
Joseph Heath (1996). Rational Choice as Critical Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (5):43-62.
Sigmund Ongstad (2010). The Concept of Lifeworld and Education in Post-Modernity : A Critical Appraisal of Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action. In Mark Murphy & Ted Fleming (eds.), Habermas, Critical Theory and Education. Routledge.
Axel Seemann (2004). Lifeworld, Discourse, and Realism: On Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Truth. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (4):503-514.
Ruyu Hung (2012). A Lifeworld Critique of 'Nature' in the Taiwanese Curriculum: A Perspective Derived From Husserl and Merleau-Ponty. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (10):1121-1132.
Rochus Sowa (2010). Husserls Idee Einer Nicht-Empirischen Wissenschaft Von der Lebenswelt. Husserl Studies 26 (1):49-66.
Wing-Chung Ho (2008). The Transcendence and Non-Discursivity of the Lifeworld. Human Studies 31 (3):323 - 342.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #145,615 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?