Justified commitments? Considering resource allocation and fairness in médecins sans frontières-Holland
Graduate studies at Western
Developing World Bioethics 6 (2):59–70 (2006)
|Abstract||Non-governmental aid programs are an important source of health care for many people in the developing world. Despite the central role non-governmental organizations (NGOs) play in the delivery of these vital services, for the most part they either lack formal systems of accountability to their recipients altogether, or have only very weak requirements in this regard. This is because most NGOs are both self-mandating and self-regulating. What is needed in terms of accountability is some means by which all the relevant stakeholders can have their interests represented and considered. An ideally accountable decision-making process for NGOs should identify acceptable justifications and rule out unacceptable ones. Thus, the point of this paper is to evaluate three prominent types of justification given for decisions taken at the Dutch headquarters of Médecins sans Frontières. They are: population health justifications, mandate based justifications and advocacy-based justifications. The central question at issue is whether these justifications are sufficiently robust to answer the concerns and objections that various stakeholders may have. I am particularly concerned with the legitimacy these justifications have in the eyes of project beneficiaries. I argue that special responsibilities to certain communities can arise out of long-term engagement with them, but that this type of priority needs to be constrained such that it does not exclude other potential beneficiaries to an undesirable extent. Finally, I suggest several new institutional mechanisms that would enhance the overall equity of decisions and so would ultimately contribute to the legitimacy of the organization as a whole.|
|Keywords||justification special obligations resource allocation medical aid|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jean-Paul Moatti (1999). Ethical Issues in the Economic Assessment of Health Care Technologies. Health Care Analysis 7 (2):153-165.
Erik Nord (1999). Towards Cost-Value Analysis in Health Care? Health Care Analysis 7 (2):167-175.
Richard Coughlan (2005). Codes, Values and Justifications in the Ethical Decision-Making Process. Journal of Business Ethics 59 (1-2):45 - 53.
Søren Holm (1995). "Socialized Medicine", Resource Allocation and Two-Tiered Health Care – the Danish Experience. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6):631-637.
Samia A. Hurst, Nathalie Mezger & Alex Mauron (2009). Allocating Resources in Humanitarian Medicine. Public Health Ethics 2 (1):89-99.
Claudia Wild (2005). Ethics of Resource Allocation: Instruments for Rational Decision Making in Support of a Sustainable Health Care. Poiesis and Praxis 3 (4):296-309.
Veronika Wirtz, Alan Cribb & Nick Barber (2003). Understanding the Role of “the Hidden Curriculum” in Resource Allocation—The Case of the UK NHS. Health Care Analysis 11 (4):295-300.
Helen Keasberry (1992). Equity and Solidarity: The Context of Health Care in the Netherlands. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (4):463-477.
Louise M. Terry (2004). An Integrated Approach to Resource Allocation. Health Care Analysis 12 (2):171-180.
P. Calain (2012). In Search of the 'New Informal Legitimacy' of Medecins Sans Frontieres. Public Health Ethics 5 (1):56-66.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,180 of 722,940 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,940 )
How can I increase my downloads?