Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (3):355-366 (2006)
|Abstract||George Reisch documents how the logical positivists adapted to their émigré status in the United States by relinquishing their leftist political ambitions and turning into the analytic philosophy establishment that persists to this day. However, there are also deep-seated tendencies in US intellectual history that provide reasons for thinking that the positivists progressive projects would never have taken holdeven if the FBI were not keeping the positivists under surveillance. These tendencies are manifested in the striking ineffectuality of US philosophers in public life. Key Words: Cold War logical positivism pragmatism university anti-intellectualism philosophy of science.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Francesco Orsi (2006). Naturalism and the Buck-Passing Account of Value. Philosophical Writings 32:58-77.
Larry Laudan (1986). Methodology's Prospects. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:347 - 354.
S. Matthew Liao (2010). The Buck-Passing Account of Value: Lessons From Crisp. Philosophical Studies 151 (3):421-432.
Steve Fuller (2008). Richard Rorty's Philosophical Legacy. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (1):121-132.
Scott Edgar (2009). Logical Empiricism, Politics, and Professionalism. Science and Education 18 (2):177-189.
Michael Friedman (1999). Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Friedman (1995). Poincaré's Conventionalism and the Logical Positivists. Foundations of Science 1 (2).
Philip Cook (2008). An Augmented Buck-Passing Account of Reasons and Value: Scanlon and Crisp on What Stops the Buck. Utilitas 20 (4):490-507.
George A. Reisch (2005). How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #178,434 of 548,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?