David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:373 - 383 (1982)
This paper considers Richard Rorty's thesis that philosophy has yielded all its subject matter to the sciences so as to no longer qualify as an autonomous discipline. We do not question his controversial historical diagnosis, but instead argue that all it shows is that the practice of philosophy does not depend on any particular subject-matter. The "philosophical turn" is taken whenever a problem is posed or an explanation is needed, for in either case one needs to go beyond the given phenomena in order to account for excluded possibilities, the choice of which makes the explainer's presence integral, in a manner that is often obscured by naive prose canons. Furthermore, the emphasis on subject matter has led philosophers to misconceive the source of difficulty in raising metaphysical questions, which is largely a matter of setting up the right narrative perspective, a point often made by literary critics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Piercey (2011). Historical Consciousness and the Identity of Philosophy. Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (3-4):411-434.
David Rondel (2009). &Quot;liberalism, Ethnocentrism, and Solidarity: Reflections on Rorty&Quot;. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:55-68.
Hin-Chung E. Hung (1987). Incommensurability and Inconsistency of Languages. Erkenntnis 27 (3):323 - 352.
Richard Rorty (ed.) (1992). The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method. University of Chicago Press.
Nicholas H. Smith (2005). Rorty on Religion and Hope. Inquiry 48 (1):76 – 98.
Steve Fuller (2008). Richard Rorty's Philosophical Legacy. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (1):121-132.
Michele Marsonet (1996). Richard Rorty's Ironic Liberalism. Journal of Philosophical Research 21:391-403.
Charles B. Guignon & David R. Hiley (eds.) (2003). Richard Rorty. Cambridge University Press.
Robert Brandom (ed.) (2000). Rorty and His Critics. Blackwell Publishers.
Richard Rorty (2006). Take Care of Freedom and Truth Will Take Care of Itself: Interviews with Richard Rorty. Stanford University Press.
Sterling Lynch (2007). Romantic Longings, Moral Ideals, and Democratic Priorities: On Richard Rorty's Use of the Distinction Between the Private and the Public. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (1):97 – 120.
Neil Gross (2008). Richard Rorty: The Making of an American Philosopher. University of Chicago Press.
Michael Bacon (2003). Liberal Universalism: On Brian Barry and Richard Rorty. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (2):41-62.
Joseph Grange (1996). The Disappearance of the Public Good: Confucius, Dewey, Rorty. Philosophy East and West 46 (3):351-366.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads5 ( #218,427 of 1,096,602 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #102,815 of 1,096,602 )
How can I increase my downloads?