Graduate studies at Western
Journal for General Philosophy of Science 43 (1):113-123 (2012)
|Abstract||Throughout the medieval and modern periods, in various sacred and secular guises, the unification of all forms of knowledge under the rubric of ‘science’ has been taken as the prerogative of humanity as a species. However, as our sense of species privilege has been called increasingly into question, so too has the very salience of ‘humanity’ and ‘science’ as general categories, let alone ones that might bear some essential relationship to each other. After showing how the ascendant Stanford School in the philosophy of science has contributed to this joint demystification of ‘humanity’ and ‘science’, I proceed on a more positive note to a conceptual framework for making sense of science as the art of being human. My understanding of ‘science’ is indebted to the red thread that runs from Christian theology through the Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment to the Humboldtian revival of the university as the site for the synthesis of knowledge as the culmination of self-development. Especially salient to this idea is science‘s epistemic capacity to manage modality (i.e. to determine the conditions under which possibilities can be actualised) and its political capacity to organize humanity into projects of universal concern. However, the challenge facing such an ideal in the twentyfirst century is that the predicate ‘human’ may be projected in three quite distinct ways, governed by what I call ‘ecological’, ‘biomedical’ and ‘cybernetic’ interests. Which one of these future humanities would claim today’s humans as proper ancestors and could these futures co-habit the same world thus become two important questions that general philosophy of science will need to address in the coming years.|
|Keywords||Humanity Modality Epistemic justice Projectibility Social epistemology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thalia Fung (2006). Philosophy: A New Knowledge and an Alternative Political Science. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:23-27.
Anatol Rapoport (1989). The Redemption of Science. Journal of Business Ethics 8 (2-3):157 - 165.
Kevin de Laplante (2004). Environmental Alchemy: How to Turn Ecological Science Into Ecological Philosophy. Environmental Ethics 26 (4):361-380.
Nicholas Maxwell (1976). What's Wrong with Science?: Towards a People's Rational Science of Delight and Compassion. Bran's Head Books Ltd.
Stathis Psillos (2012). What is General Philosophy of Science? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 43 (1):93-103.
P. D. Magnus (2013). Philosophy of Science in the Twenty-First Century. Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):48-52.
Nicholas Maxwell (2009). What’s Wrong With Science? Towards a People’s Rational Science of Delight and Compassion, Second Edition. Pentire Press.
Kevin deLaplante, Bryson Brown & Kent A. Peacock (eds.) (2011). Philosophy of Ecology. North-Holland.
James A. Stieb (2007). On “Bettering Humanity” in Science and Engineering Education. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2):265-273.
Alfred I. Tauber (2009). Science and the Quest for Meaning. Baylor University Press.
Jeremy Bendik-Keymer (2005). Common Humanity and Human Rights. Social Philosophy Today 21:51-62.
Nicholas Maxwell (2004). Is Science Neurotic? Imperial College Press.
Ronald N. Giere (1999). Science Without Laws. University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2012-02-29
Total downloads13 ( #95,599 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?