Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times

University of Chicago Press (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This work discusses whether Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions was revolutionary. Steve Fuller argues that Kuhn held a profoundly conservative view of science and how one ought to study its history.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Steve Fuller, Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times. [REVIEW]F. Remedios - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):97-99.
Thomas Kuhn and the Legacy of Logical Positivism.M. A. Notturno - 1997 - History of the Human Sciences 10 (1):131-134.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
A Fuller Vision of Thomas Kuhn: Response to Roth and Mirowski.Steve Fuller - 2001 - History of the Human Sciences 14 (2):111-117.
Carnap, Kuhn, and the History of Science: A Reply to Thomas Uebel.J. C. Pinto de Oliveira - 2015 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 46 (1):215-223.
Thomas Kuhn: a Personal Judgement.Steve Fuller - 1997 - History of the Human Sciences 10 (1):129-131.
Interpreting Thomas Kuhn as a Response-Dependence Theorist.Nathaniel Goldberg - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (5):729 - 752.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-20

Downloads
56 (#254,517)

6 months
4 (#315,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steve Fuller
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

Thomas Kuhn.Alexander Bird - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The many encounters of Thomas Kuhn and French epistemology.Simons Massimiliano - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 61:41-50.
Thought styles and paradigms—a comparative study of Ludwik Fleck and Thomas S. Kuhn.Nicola Mößner - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (2):362–371.
Social Epistemology: A Quarter-Century Itinerary.Steve Fuller - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (3-4):267-283.
From Fleck's denkstil to Kuhn's paradigm: Conceptual schemes and incommensurability.Babette E. Babich - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):75 – 92.

View all 97 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Metaphysics and the new science.Gary Hatfield - 1990 - In David Lindberg & Robert Westman (eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. by and (Cambridge:. Cambridge University Press. pp. 93–166.

Add more references