Egocentric perspectives and the epistemic significance of disagreement

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

What should we do when we disagree?Jennifer Lackey - 2005 - In Tamar SzabĂł Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 274-93.
Moral Intuitions, Reliability, and Disagreement.David Killoren - 2009 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 4 (1):1-35.
Who is an epistemic peer?Axel Gelfert - 2011 - Logos and Episteme 2 (4):507-514.
The moral evil demons.Ralph Wedgwood - 2010 - In Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
A justificationist view of disagreement’s epistemic significance.Jennifer Lackey - 2008 - In Alan Millar Adrian Haddock & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 145-154.
Possible disagreements and defeat.Brandon Carey - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (3):371-381.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-06-16

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Fumerton
University of Iowa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references