The Dialectic of the Individual and the Paradox of French Absolutism
The European Legacy 16 (6):717 - 734 (2011)
| Abstract | In her seminal book, Philosophy and the State in France, Nannerl O. Keohane uncovered something close to a paradox: French absolutism bred a peculiar form of individualism that manifested disregard for civic involvement, yet by the eighteenth century the passive member of the ancient corporations moved without hesitation into participatory politics. The aim of this article is to clarify this apparent paradox. In order to do so, I revive the medieval dialectic between forum internum and forum externum that for more than a thousand years provided the foundation for individualism all across the Western world. One cannot understand the paradoxes that later will mark the French Revolution if one fails to take into consideration the almost obsessive focus on the forum internum and on the authenticity of the self coupled with a drive toward conformism and unity in the forum externum, which was already in place for more than a century before. Furthermore, one cannot understand why political representation as representation of individual wills was not at all appealing to the early modern Frenchmen. Given today's worrisome disaffection of the typical individual with the formalized political sphere, the dialectic of the two fora is worth reconsidering | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAlin Fumurescu (2013). Compromise: A Political and Philosophical History. Cambridge University Press.
Gregor Betz (forthcoming). Revamping Hypothetico-Deductivism: A Dialectic Account of Confirmation. Erkenntnis.
Downing A. Thomas (2002). Aesthetics of Opera in the Ancien Régime, 1647-1785. Cambridge University Press.
Chris W. Surprenant (2005). A Reconciliation of Kant's Views on Revolution. Interpretation 32 (2):151-169.
Branden Fitelson (2006). The Paradox of Confirmation. Philosophy Compass 1 (1):95–113.
Henry B. Piper (2004). Kierkegaard's Non-Dialectical Dialectic or That Kierkegaard is Not Hegelian. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (4):497-517.
Bhikhu Parekh (2009). Logic of Identity. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (3):267-284.
Eleonore Stump (1989). Dialectic and its Place in the Development of Medieval Logic. Cornell University Press.
Sudhir Hazareesingh (ed.) (2002). The Jacobin Legacy in Modern France: Essays in Honour of Vincent Wright. OUP Oxford.
Ioannis Trisokkas (2011/12). Hegel on the Particular in the Science of Logic. The Owl of Minerva 43 (1/2):1-40.
D. V. Nikulin (2010). Dialectic and Dialogue. Stanford University Press.
Ian James (2012). The New French Philosophy. Polity Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-09-21Total downloads8 ( #124,608 of 556,888 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,888 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
