Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy (forthcoming)
|Abstract||In contrast to the traditional and ordinary interpretation of Xunzi’s theory of human nature, which considers Xunzi’s theory as claiming that human nature is bad or evil, this article aims at, first, arguing that the interpretation is wrong or at least incomplete and, second, constructing a new interpretation that, according to Xunzi’s text, there are some factors in human nature that are able to promote good behaviors. I shall demonstrate that some major paragraphs in Xunzi’s text were misinterpreted and misarranged, analyze that the word wei (artifice) in the chapter of “Zhengming” has two different but related senses, one of which designates some of the potential capacities of human nature, and argue that the 23 words in the chapter of “Rongru” should not be deleted as redundant, as was done by the two famous philologists in Qing dynasdy, W ang Niansun and W ang Xianqian|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dan Robins (2001-2002). The Development of Xunzi's Theory of Xing. Early China 26:99-158.
David E. Soles (1999). The Nature and Grounds of Xunzi's Disagreement with Mencius. Asian Philosophy 9 (2):123 – 133.
Kim Chong Chong (2003). Xunzi's Systematic Critique of Mencius. Philosophy East and West 53 (2):215-233.
Alejandro Bárcenas (2012). Xunzi and Han Fei on Human Nature. International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2):135-148.
Shiyou Zhan (2007). Cultivation (Jiaohua, 教化): The Goal of Xunzi's Ethical Thought. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (1):25-49.
Kim Sungmoon (2011). From Desire to Civility: Is Xunzi a Hobbesian? Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (3):291-309.
Youguang Li (2010). The True or the Artificial: Theories on Human Nature Before Mencius and Xunzi-Based on “ Sheng is From Ming , and Ming is From Tian ”. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (1):31-50.
Yu Jiyuan (2005). Human Nature and Virtue in Mencius and Xunzi: An Aristotelian Interpretation. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 5 (1):11-30.
Jiyuan Yu (2006). Human Nature and Virtue in Mencius and Xunzi: An Aristotelian Interpretation. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 5 (1):11-30.
Shirley Chan (2009). Human Nature and Moral Cultivation in the Guodian 郭店 Text of the Xing Zi Ming Chu 性自命出 (Nature Derives From Mandate). Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (4).
James Behuniak (2000). Nivison and the "Problem" in Xunzi's Ethics. Philosophy East and West 50 (1):97-110.
Kurtis G. Hagen, Confucian Constructivism: A Reconstruction and Application of the Philosophy of Xunzi.
Lynne Rudder Baker (2005). Interpretation in Action: A Preliminary Inquiry. In Fernando Mão de Ferro (ed.), A Explicação da Interpretação Humana (Portuguese). Edições Colibri.
A. S. Cua (2005). Human Nature, Ritual, and History: Studies in Xunzi and Chinese Philosophy. The Catholic University of America Press.
Kurtis Hagen (2002). Xunzi's Use of Zhengming: Naming as a Constructive Project. Asian Philosophy 12 (1):35 – 51.
Added to index2012-04-11
Total downloads8 ( #131,711 of 722,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,863 )
How can I increase my downloads?