Riccardo Fusaroli, Bahador Bahrami, Karsten Olsen, Andreas Roepstorff, Geraint Rees, Chris Frith & Kristian Tylén
Psychological Science 23 (8):931-939 (2012)
|Abstract||Sharing a public language facilitates particularly efficient forms of joint perception and action by giving interlocutors refined tools for directing attention and aligning conceptual models and action. We hypothesized that interlocutors who flexibly align their linguistic practices and converge on a shared language will improve their cooperative performance on joint tasks. To test this prediction, we employed a novel experimental design, in which pairs of participants cooperated linguistically to solve a perceptual task. We found that dyad members generally showed a high propensity to adapt to each other’s linguistic practices. However, although general linguistic alignment did not have a positive effect on performance, the alignment of particular task-relevant vocabularies strongly correlated with collective performance. In other words, the more dyad members selectively aligned linguistic tools fit for the task, the better they performed. Our work thus uncovers the interplay between social dynamics and sensitivity to task affordances in successful cooperation.|
|Keywords||language social interaction problem solving cooperation psycholinguistics interactive alignment distributed cognition|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Riccardo Fusaroli & Kristian Tylen (2012). Carving Language for Social Coordination: A Dynamical Approach. Interaction Studies 13 (1):103-124.
Holly P. Branigan (2004). Full Alignment of Some but Not All Representations in Dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):191-192.
Kristian Tylén, Ethan Weed, Mikkel Wallentin, Andreas Roepstorff & Chris D. Frith (2010). Language as a Tool for Interacting Minds. Mind and Language 25 (1):3-29.
Mark Jeffreys (2007). How Can “Cheap Talk” Yield Coordination, Given a Conflict? Mind and Society 7 (1):95-108.
Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod (2004). The Interactive-Alignment Model: Developments and Refinements. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):212-225.
Allan Mazur (2004). Beyond Linguistic Alignment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):205-206.
Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod (2004). Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):169-190.
Patrick G. T. Healey (2004). Dialogue in the Degenerate Case? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):201-201.
Niels O. Schiller & Jan Peter de Ruiter (2004). Some Notes on Priming, Alignment, and Self-Monitoring. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):208-209.
Giovanni Pezzulo (2011). Shared Representations as Coordination Tools for Interaction. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (2):303-333.
Simon Garrod & Martin J. Pickering (2003). Linguistics Fit for Dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):678-678.
Maarten C. W. Janssen (2003). Coordination and Cooperation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):165-166.
Peter F. Dominey (2004). Situation Alignment and Routinization in Language Acquisition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):195-195.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-08-19
Total downloads6 ( #145,615 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?