David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 12 (1):87-95 (2010)
The accuracy principle is one of the key standards of informational privacy. It epitomises the obligation for those processing personal data to keep their records accurate and up-to-date, with the aim of protecting individuals from unfair decisions. Currently, however, different practices being put in place in order to enhance the protection of individuals appear to deliberately rely on the use of ‘inaccurate’ personal information. This article explores such practices and tries to assess their potential for privacy protection, giving particular attention to their legal implications and to related ethical issues. Ultimately, it suggests that the use of ‘inaccurate’ data can potentially play a useful role to preserve the informational autonomy of the individual, and that any understandings of privacy or personal data protection that would tend to unduly limit such potential should be critically questioned.
|Keywords||Data protection Informational privacy Informational self-determination Privacy Surveillance|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Anthony Danna & Oscar H. Gandy (2002). All That Glitters is Not Gold: Digging Beneath the Surface of Data Mining. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 40 (4):373 - 386.
Jeroen Van Den Hoven & Pieter E. Vermaas (2007). Nano-Technology and Privacy: On Continuous Surveillance Outside the Panopticon. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (3):283 – 297.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
M. Newman & G. Marks Chabris (1987). Employment and Privacy: A Problem for Our Time. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 6 (2):153 - 163.
Feng-Yang Kuo, Cathy S. Lin & Meng-Hsiang Hsu (2007). Assessing Gender Differences in Computer Professionals' Self-Regulatory Efficacy Concerning Information Privacy Practices. Journal of Business Ethics 73 (2):145 - 160.
Dag Elgesem (1999). The Structure of Rights in Directive 95/46/EC on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and the Free Movement of Such Data. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 1 (4):283-293.
David Matheson (2007). Unknowableness and Informational Privacy. Journal of Philosophical Research 32:251-267.
Luciano Floridi (2006). Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109-119.
Alan Rubel (2011). The Particularized Judgment Account of Privacy. Res Publica 17 (3):275-290.
Diane P. Michelfelder (2001). The Moral Value of Informational Privacy in Cyberspace. Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):129-135.
Elin Palm (2009). Privacy Expectations at Work—What is Reasonable and Why? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (2):201 - 215.
Herman T. Tavani (1999). Informational Privacy, Data Mining, and the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (2):137-145.
Peter Hustinx (2010). Privacy by Design: Delivering the Promises. [REVIEW] Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):253-255.
Added to index2009-10-31
Total downloads33 ( #125,327 of 1,911,645 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #254,182 of 1,911,645 )
How can I increase my downloads?