The Uselessness of the New Testament: a Response To David Parker

Studies in Christian Ethics 10 (2):58-61 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to William Beik and David Parker.Henry Heller - 2010 - Historical Materialism 18 (2):132-142.
Ethics and the New Testament.David Parker - 1997 - Studies in Christian Ethics 10 (2):39-57.
Christian ecotheology and the old testament.Susan Power Bratton - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (3):195-209.
Francis H. Parker, 1920-2004.Alan Paskow, Valerie Parker Sugden, Cynthia Parker, Bob McArthur, Dan Cohen, Bill Rowe, Calvin Schrag, Aryeh Kosman, Bo Schambelan, Marc Briod & Bob Martin - 2007 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 81 (2):176 - 179.
Response to Raymond Gibbs.S. Gillian Parker - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (3):437-439.
Contributions to the theory of clumps.Arthur Frederick Parker Parker-Rhodes - 1961 - [Cambridge, Eng.,: Cambridge Language Research Unit.
Directors and DVD commentary: The specifics of intention.Deborah Parker & Mark Parker - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (1):13–22.
Introduction.Robert E. Goodin & David Parker - 2000 - Ethics 111 (1):5-7.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
29 (#472,224)

6 months
1 (#1,028,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references