David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 9 (3):159 - 169 (1990)
Professions are granted autonomy by society, to regulate their own affairs. In return for the economic benefits autonomy grants to professions, society expects professions to act in a socially responsible manner. This paper presents a game-theoretic analysis of the relationship between society and professions, which shows that the relationship is unstable in the face of opportunities for professions to renege on the social contract. It also shows how periodic controversies regarding the degree to which professionals act in the public interest are expected to occur periodically, and how they are resolved.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richmond Campbell & Lanning Snowden (eds.) (1985). Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation: Prisoner's Dilemma and Newcomb's Problem. University of British Columbia Press.
Dennis C. Mueller (1982). Public Choice. Ethics 92 (3):560-561.
Citations of this work BETA
Jeffrey R. Cohen, Laurie W. Pant & David J. Sharp (1992). Cultural and Socioeconomic Constraints on International Codes of Ethics: Lessons From Accounting. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 11 (9):687 - 700.
Similar books and articles
Richard Rowson (2006). Working Ethics: How to Be Fair in a Culturally Complex World. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Sarah Banks (2004). Ethics, Accountability, and the Social Professions. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jeanne F. Backof & Charles L. Martin (1991). Historical Perspectives: Development of the Codes of Ethics in the Legal, Medical and Accounting Professions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (2):99 - 110.
Mike W. Martin (2000). Meaningful Work: Rethinking Professional Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2009). On the Narrow Epistemology of Game Theoretic Agents. In Ondrej Majer, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Tero Tulenheimo (eds.), Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy. Springer
Maureen Kelley (2002). The Meanings of Professional Life: Teaching Across the Health Professions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (4):475 – 491.
Lisa J. Carlson & Raymond Dacey (2010). Social Norms and the Traditional Deterrence Game. Synthese 176 (1):105 - 123.
Neil Tennant (2001). Game Theory and Conventiont. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):3-19.
José Luis Ferreira & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2008). The Surprise Exam Paradox, Rationality, and Pragmatics: A Simple Game‐Theoretic Analysis. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (3):285-299.
Effy Oz (1993). Ethical Standards for Computer Professionals: A Comparative Analysis of Four Major Codes. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 12 (9):709 - 726.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #170,336 of 1,941,072 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #149,740 of 1,941,072 )
How can I increase my downloads?