Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 9 (3):159 - 169 (1990)
|Abstract||Professions are granted autonomy by society, to regulate their own affairs. In return for the economic benefits autonomy grants to professions, society expects professions to act in a socially responsible manner. This paper presents a game-theoretic analysis of the relationship between society and professions, which shows that the relationship is unstable in the face of opportunities for professions to renege on the social contract. It also shows how periodic controversies regarding the degree to which professionals act in the public interest are expected to occur periodically, and how they are resolved.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard Rowson (2006). Working Ethics: How to Be Fair in a Culturally Complex World. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
José Luis Ferreira & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2008). The Surprise Exam Paradox, Rationality, and Pragmatics: A Simple Game‐Theoretic Analysis. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (3):285-299.
Neil Tennant (2001). Game Theory and Conventiont. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):3-19.
Lisa J. Carlson & Raymond Dacey (2010). Social Norms and the Traditional Deterrence Game. Synthese 176 (1):105 - 123.
Maureen Kelley (2002). The Meanings of Professional Life: Teaching Across the Health Professions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (4):475 – 491.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2009). On the Narrow Epistemology of Game Theoretic Agents. In Ondrej Majer, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Tero Tulenheimo (eds.), Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy. Springer.
Mike W. Martin (2000). Meaningful Work: Rethinking Professional Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Jeanne F. Backof & Charles L. Martin (1991). Historical Perspectives: Development of the Codes of Ethics in the Legal, Medical and Accounting Professions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (2):99 - 110.
Sarah Banks (2004). Ethics, Accountability, and the Social Professions. Palgrave Macmillan.
Effy Oz (1993). Ethical Standards for Computer Professionals: A Comparative Analysis of Four Major Codes. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 12 (9):709 - 726.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,589 of 740,559 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,957 of 740,559 )
How can I increase my downloads?