Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (1):65 - 81 (2006)
|Abstract||Based on the premise that what is relevant, consistent, or true may change from context to context, a formal framework of relevance and context is proposed in which • contexts are mathematical entities • each context has its own language with relevant implication • the languages of distinct contexts are connected by embeddings • inter-context deduction is supported by bridge rules • databases are sets of formulae tagged with deductive histories and the contexts they belong to • abduction and revision are supported by a notion of consistency of formulae and sets of formulae which are relative to a context, and which can, in turn, be seen as constituents of agendas|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christopher Gauker (2010). Indirect Discourse, Relativism, and Contexts That Point to Other Contexts. In François Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftali Villanueva (eds.), Context-dependence, Perspective and Relativity in Language and Thought.
John Perry (1998). Indexicals, Contexts and Unarticulated Constituents. In Proceedings of the 1995 CSLI-Armsterdam Logic, Language and Computation Conference. CSLI Publications.
Benedikt Löwe & Thomas Müller (2008). Mathematical Knowledge is Context Dependent. Grazer Philosophische Studien 76 (1):91-107.
Bernard Walliser, Denis Zwirn & Hervé Zwirn (2005). Abductive Logics in a Belief Revision Framework. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (1):87-117.
Kent Bach (2012). Context Dependence. In Manuel García-Carpintero & Max Kölbel (eds.), The Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Continuum International Pub..
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #71,180 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?