Fibring argumentation frames
Studia Logica (forthcoming)
| Abstract | This paper is part of a research program centered around argumentation networks and offering several research directions for argumentation networks, with a view of using such networks for integrating logics and network reasoning. In Section 1 we introduce our program manifesto. In Section 2 we motivate and show how to substitute one argumentation network as a node in another argumentation network. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDouglas N. Walton (2008). Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge University Press.
David M. Godden (2003). Arguing at Cross-Purposes: Discharging the Dialectical Obligations of the Coalescent Model of Argumentation. Argumentation 17 (2):219-243.
Martin W. A. Caminada & Dov M. Gabbay (forthcoming). A Logical Account of Formal Argumentation. Studia Logica.
Bart Verheij (2003). Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic. Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):167-195.
Dov M. Gabbay & Artur S. D.’Avila Garcez (forthcoming). Logical Modes of Attack in Argumentation Networks. Studia Logica.
Ana Nettel & Georges Roque (2012). Persuasive Argumentation Versus Manipulation. Argumentation 26 (1):55-69.
Dov M. Gabbay (forthcoming). Semantics for Higher Level Attacks in Extended Argumentation Frames Part 1: Overview. Studia Logica.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-11-21Total downloads7 ( #133,637 of 550,917 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
