“The Climax of Reconciliation”: Transgression, Apology, Forgiveness and the Body in Conflict Resolution [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):245-256 (2011)
According to Charles Hauss, “[i]n the last few years, reconciliation has become one of the ‘hottest’ topics in the increasingly ‘hot’ field of conflict resolution” ( 2003 , ¶1). However, despite the apparent interest in this “hot” academic topic (which is becoming increasingly warm in Canada as our own Truth and Reconciliation Commission commences), reconciliation studies have been dominated by Truth-based approaches. The restrictions of these approaches, which emphasize objectivity and rationality, often elide the body and the primacy of emotions in the reparative process. This essay begins a conversation on the role of the body and emotion in the study of reconciliation by engaging the work being done in the social sciences with contemporary trends in critical theory and literature. I argue that by looking at the fundamental role the body plays on the “road to reconciliation” we can devise a more vital approach to conflict resolution and the various processes that make it up
|Keywords||Reconciliation Apology Forgiveness Conflict resolution Critical theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Susan Dwyer (1999). Reconciliation for Realists. Ethics and International Affairs 13 (1):81–98.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Danielle Poe (2007). On U.S. Lynching: Remembrance, Apology, and Reconciliation. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):88-98.
Danielle Poe (2007). On U.S. Lynching. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):88-98.
Rosemary R. P. Lerner (2007). Between Conflict and Reconciliation: The Hard Truth. [REVIEW] Human Studies 30 (2):115 - 130.
Alphonso Lingis (2011). Truth in Reconciliation. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):239-243.
Michael E. Palanski (2012). Forgiveness and Reconciliation in the Workplace: A Multi-Level Perspective and Research Agenda. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 109 (3):275-287.
Colleen Murphy (2010). A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation. Cambridge University Press.
Michele Moody-Adams (2010). Reply to Griswold, Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration. [REVIEW] Philosophia 38 (3):429-437.
Michalinos Zembylas (2011). Mourning and Forgiveness as Sites of Reconciliation Pedagogies. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):257-265.
Thaddeus Metz (2015). A Theory of National Reconciliation: Some Insights From Africa. In Claudio Corradetti, Nir Eisikovits & Jack Rotondi (eds.), Theorizing Transitional Justice. Ashgate. 119-35.
Zenon Szablowinski (2012). Religion and Conflict Resolution: Christianity and South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission. By Megan Shore. Pp. Xviii, 211, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2009, $89.95. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 53 (3):526-527.
R. Bhargava (2012). The Difficulty of Reconciliation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (4-5):369-377.
Sandor Goodhart (2011). “The Self and Other People. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 7 (16):14-25.
Robert Paul Churchill (2007). Moral Toleration and Deep Reconciliation. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):99-112.
Added to index2011-07-12
Total downloads16 ( #116,729 of 1,410,536 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #108,810 of 1,410,536 )
How can I increase my downloads?